FOLLOW US ON TWITTER...

Although the premise of this blog may seem a bit weird, I think it would be cool to have some of you create a twitter account and follow my comments there, since it makes it easier to comment, place images, and generally complain about our current political situation.

We can do this easily until the midterm elections get started and the general feeling that most Americans have towards politics gets lighter.

I think this will keep the site alive and will also make our hiatus temporal...

Let me know what you think!!

http://www.twitter.com/savagepolitics

Al-Retardea

The Obama 9/11 recreation, witnessed by thousands of New Yorkers, and which has confounded many Americans, not only represents the utter low class stupidity and arrogance of this administration, but their complete incapacity to organize even a photo op.

Here is an excerpt of the main story:

The Department of Defense photo shoot involved a Boeing 747 used as Air Force One and one fighter jet flying at low altitude in the area around Ground Zero.

Residents and workers in Lower Manhattan and New Jersey, unaware of the photo op, ran into the streets, traumatized by memories of 9-11 and afraid of another attack. Emergency offices in both cities were inundated with hundreds of frightened calls. "It scared a couple of million people," one airport official said.

Late Tuesday, the Air Force said the planes flew as part of a training mission: "The hours would have been flown regardless and the expenses would have been accrued on a different mission," a statement said.

But this is not all, CBS is now reporting that the administration's internal memos clearly understood that this action would create chaos in the populace of New York:

Federal officials knew that sending two fighter jets and Air Force One to buzz ground zero and Lady Liberty might set off nightmarish fears of a 9/11 replay, but they still ordered the photo-op kept secret from the public.

In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD the Federal Aviation Administration's James Johnston said the agency was aware of "the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes" in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor's office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.
SOURCE

Of course, you can well imagine that the media is rushing to somehow exculpate the President himself, even though claiming that he didn't know anything about this only proves his incompetence and his weak incapacity to keep his officials under a tight rope. The true alternative to a conniving and insensitive president is a moronic and irresponsible weakling, which much worse by most standards.

Either way, I hope Americans take it all in and come to appreciate what they have done to their country with their impulsive and brainless vote, only 100 days ago.

Remember, Vice President Biden gave us 6 months of tranquility before something "big" will happen against our nation's security. By then, these 100 days will seem like a breeze.

The Obama Deception

Watch the full documentary. It is a wonderful collection of Obama's scam on the American people.

To most of us, there is no news here, but you should still spread the word.

Gandhi Rapper

I have written countless times before that the ignorant may be considered 'blissful', but that doesn't stop them from being completely useless morons.

I have thus, to prove the importance of understanding history, given as an example the fact that Abraham Lincoln was not only a hardcore "racist" (within the context of modern American understanding), but that he also considered the concept of 'racial equality' to be an utterly ridiculous sham (he actually argued this on a presidential debate). Nonetheless, because of the self inflicting stupidity of the masses, our Media continues to utilize said President as a symbol of something that never happened (and even compare Mr. Obama to him!). But just a superficial look into the history of the Civil War demonstrates WITHOUT A DOUBT that said war was NOT fought for the abolition of slavery but over the issue of State rights and economic liberty.

We also face the same reality when we study the Civil Rights movement, which in fact had no direct responsibility for desegregation in the south. If you would like to thank anybody, please send a gift to the Federal Supreme Court and then specifically target the most ardent capitalists and Darwinists on the bench (if you could back in time, specifically congratulate Justice Black, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan who was instrumental in these changes), all of whom utilized ECONOMIC/CAPITALIST arguments to apply the Commerce Clause in our Constitution in a way that would allow customers "of all races and creeds" to purchase products wherever they went (the true motivator behind racial integration).

Today, some Media sources are starting to foam at the mouth at "suddenly finding out" that Mr. Gandhi was not only a far cry from the Liberal fiction that many of them have eulogized, but was in fact an admirer of Hitler, a 'hater' of both the Black and Jewish race, and an advocate of reestablishing a strict caste system around the world.

Here are some of his own personal quotes, which I have mentioned before, but that are conveniently ignored by our local Liberals (SOURCE):

During his early civil disobedience in South Africa, Gandhi, the authors say, made it clear he was not fighting for a colorblind society, but one that would be dominated by whites and Indians at the expense of blacks: "Ours is on continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pass his life of indolence and nakedness." "Kaffir" is a pejorative South African term for blacks, equivalent to the "n" word in America.

* "We believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do. … We believe also that the white race of South Africa should be the predominating race."

* In a letter to Hitler in 1941, Gandhi wrote: "Nor do I believe that you are the monster described by your opponents."

* "Hitler killed 5 million Jews. … But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs."

* Regarding Washington, he wrote: "I do not hesitate to say that it is highly unlikely that had I lived as (his contemporary), I would have called (him) a misguided patriot."

Should anybody be surprised that the Mainstream Media willfully keeps most Americans ignorant of basic historic truths? What is so inconvenient about reality?

If Liberals wish to have any heroes, they are necessarily forced to mold real ones into themselves, since most individuals who hold said beliefs tend to be quite spineless and cowardly. A man like Gandhi sounds like a tough guy to them, except that in truth he doesn't ideologically belong to them, but to the ultra conservative right (an irony that I find quite humorous). This same principle applies to almost all of their heroes, including Martin Luther King, Jr., who was in fact a social conservative and a Republican (a leftist combination which was still not common at the time).

But the truth is more important than comfort, and knowing everything about eulogized historical characters is not only our duty, it is highly convenient when you wish to remove the veil of lies that you are fed on a daily basis.

When someone tells you that we should emulate somebody, look closely into all of their work. And if you have to admit that somebody that doesn't quite agree with you is admirable, do so with full knowledge and without the need to make them into something they are not.

The Fat Men Commeth

Just when you thought that almost everything was responsible for global warming, we can now add 'overweight humans' to that list. According to London researchers (I am willing to bet that they are also tofu eating Liberals):

Each fat person is said to be responsible for emitting a tonne more of climate-warming carbon dioxide per year than a thin one.

It means an extra BILLION TONNES of CO2 a year is created, according to World Health Organization estimates of overweight people.

The scientists say providing extra grub for them to guzzle adds to carbon emissions that heat up the world, melting polar ice caps, raising sea levels and killing rain forests.

The environmental impact of fat humans is made even worse because they are more likely to travel by car — another major cause of carbon emissions.

How will the state monitor citizens and their eating habits when they decided to outlaw fat in this country? I think the following story may give you a quick answer:

Two FBI workers are accused of using surveillance equipment to spy on teenage girls as they undressed and tried on prom gowns at a charity event at a West Virginia mall.

The FBI employees have been charged with conspiracy and committing criminal invasion of privacy. They were working in an FBI satellite control room at the mall when they positioned a camera on temporary changing rooms and zoomed in for at least 90 minutes on girls dressing for the Cinderella Project fashion show, Marion County Prosecutor Pat Wilson said Monday.

These are just a couple of "harmless" perverts with access to multi-million dollar spying machines utilized to satisfy their sexual proclivities, the question is: What will happen when these incompetent government bureaucrats actually happen to hire individuals who will do their jobs right (and actually spy on their list of "dubious" citizens)?

I think the possibility of an actual working State is even scarier than a bunch of degenerate spies.

"Please Don't Shoot Them"

I believe the following story deserves to be posted in its entirety:

WASHINGTON – While Barack Obama is basking in praise for his "decisive" handling of the Somali pirate attack on a merchant
ship in the India Ocean, reliable military sources close to the scene are painting a much different picture of the incident – accusing the president of employing restrictive rules of engagement that actually hampered the rescue of Capt. Richard Phillips and extended the drama at sea for days.

Multiple opportunities to free the captain of the Maersk Alabama from three young pirates were missed, these sources say – all because a Navy SEAL team was not immediately ordered to the scene and then forced to operate under strict, non-lethal rules of engagement.

They say the response duty office at the Pentagon was initially unwilling to grant an order to use lethal force to rescue Phillips. They also report the White House refused to authorize deployment of a Navy SEAL team to the location for 36 hours, despite the recommendation of the on-scene commander.

The White House also turned down two rescue plans offered up by the Seal commander on the scene and the captain of the USS Bainbridge.

The SEAL team operated under rules of engagement that required them to do nothing unless the hostage's life was in "imminent' danger.

In fact, when the USS Bainbridge dispatched a rigid-hull inflatable boat to bring supplies to the Maersk Alabama, it came under fire that could not be returned even though the SEAL team had the pirates in their sights.

Many hours before the fatal shots were fired, taking out the three young pirates, Phillips jumped into the Indian Ocean with the idea of giving the snipers a clear target. However, the SEAL team was still under orders not to shoot.

Hours later, frustrated by the missed opportunities to resolve the standoff, the commander of the Bainbridge and the captain of the Navy SEAL team determined they had operational authority to evaluate the risk to the hostage, and took out the pirates at the first opportunity – finally freeing Phillips.

SOURCE

Does the term 'pussyfooting' fit the current administration, or are we being unjustly offensive to all other effeminate presidents worldwide?

Buddies

While most Americans are preoccupied about their economic livelihood and our collective security from rogue nations, our President seems to fee very cozy with our enemies (enjoy pictures above). Specially those who have slaughtered and oppressed thousands for their own personal satisfaction.

Now there is some breaking information regarding the White House's flip flopping in dealing with the Somali pirates, allegedly even going so far as restricting the movement of the Navy Seals so as to not cause "harm" to the "poor misguided teenagers". Don't worry though, we will probably never find out about this thanks to our "loyal" mainstream media.

Read the following story and don't be surprised:

Obama appointee suggest new "licensing" of News Media